Last week, the spotlight of the labor movement was firmly fixed on Vance, Alabama, where over 4,500 workers at the Mercedes-Benz plant cast their votes in a closely watched union election. The United Auto Workers (UAW) sought to represent these workers, but faced a determined anti-union campaign from both Mercedes-Benz and Republican state leaders in Alabama. Ultimately, workers voted against unionization, highlighting the significant challenges facing labor organizers in the current American landscape. However, even in this defeat, the efforts of the UAW have yielded tangible benefits for Mercedes workers, demonstrating a crucial point: worker organizing, in itself, can be a powerful tool for improvement, regardless of the immediate outcome of a union vote.
The result in Alabama underscores the uphill battle faced by unions in the United States. Decades of policy and legal frameworks have created a system where the odds are often stacked against workers seeking collective bargaining power. As documented extensively by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), U.S. labor laws are inherently unequal. In 2023, a staggering number of over 60 million American workers expressed a desire to join a union, yet were unable to do so. This gap between worker interest and union representation is further widened by the aggressive tactics employed by employers to counter unionization efforts. Companies in the U.S. spend over $400 million annually on union avoidance consultants. Furthermore, employers are found to have illegally obstructed union election campaigns in over 40% of cases.
Adding to these challenges are “right-to-work” (RTW) laws, prevalent in states like Alabama. These laws, deceptively named, weaken unions by allowing workers to benefit from union contracts without contributing to union dues, thereby undermining the financial strength and collective power of labor organizations. The economic consequences of RTW laws are clear: workers in RTW states earn, on average, 3.2% less than their counterparts in states without such legislation. For a full-time worker, this translates to an annual loss of $1,670. Historically, RTW laws have been explicitly designed to hinder worker organizing and maintain a low-wage environment.
In Alabama, Mercedes-Benz workers experienced the full force of this anti-union machinery. The campaign leading up to the election saw a concerted effort from both the company and the state government to dissuade workers from unionizing. Governor Kay Ivey, alongside other Southern Republican governors, issued a public statement warning of the supposed dangers of unionization, claiming it would jeopardize jobs within the state. This rhetoric echoes a long and troubling history of anti-unionism in the South, often intertwined with racial biases and aimed at suppressing worker power. Despite accusing the UAW of using “scare tactics,” Governor Ivey herself employed such tactics, even signing into law measures designed to punish companies that voluntarily cooperate with unions during organizing drives.
Mercedes-Benz implemented a relentless campaign within its plant, subjecting workers to mandatory “captive audience” meetings. In these meetings, anti-union messages and videos were repeated incessantly. These tactics are so concerning that at least seven states have banned captive audience meetings to protect workers’ rights to freedom of thought and association. Mercedes management reportedly targeted team leaders, individuals often seeking promotions, applying intense daily pressure to influence their votes against the union.
However, focusing solely on the anti-union tactics of Mercedes and the state of Alabama risks obscuring a critical takeaway from this campaign: even when union elections are unsuccessful, worker organizing can still lead to significant improvements in working conditions. Remarkably, just a month after the UAW announced that a substantial 30% of Mercedes workers had signed union cards indicating their interest, the company implemented a $2-per-hour wage increase for its highest-paid workers. Crucially, Mercedes also eliminated the two-tier wage system, a structure that had previously prevented many workers from reaching higher pay levels. Further demonstrating a shift in response to worker pressure, Mercedes also replaced its long-serving U.S. CEO, removing an unpopular figure from leadership. The new CEO publicly pledged to cultivate a “culture that puts you [the workers] first” and to make decisions “in your best interest.” This series of changes strongly suggests that the organizing efforts of the UAW, even without a formal union victory, prompted Mercedes to address worker concerns proactively.
The ripple effects of UAW organizing extend beyond Mercedes-Benz. The UAW’s successful “Stand Up Strike” against the “Big Three” automakers in October 2023, which resulted in a landmark contract, has demonstrably influenced wages across the automotive industry. The day after the UAW secured this victory, Toyota announced significant raises, up to $3.70 per hour, at its Kentucky plant. Honda followed suit with an 11% wage increase, and Hyundai increased pay for its U.S. workers by 14%, with a further 25% increase scheduled by 2028.
While these companies may not explicitly attribute these raises to UAW pressure, the timing and scale of these increases strongly suggest a direct response to the union’s organizing successes and the broader momentum of the labor movement. Despite employer rhetoric often portraying unions as detrimental to workers, the reality is that unions demonstrably improve worker wages, expand access to crucial benefits like paid leave, promote racial equity in the workplace, and contribute to a stronger democratic society overall.
The experience of Mercedes workers in Alabama provides a valuable lesson. Organizing for better working conditions is inherently beneficial for workers. Even in the face of powerful opposition and without achieving formal union recognition, collective action can yield tangible improvements. The more workers unite and advocate for better jobs, the more likely they, and workers across industries, are to experience positive change.
Are you interested in learning more about how to empower workers and build a stronger economy for everyone? Sign up for EPI’s newsletter to stay informed on cutting-edge research and insightful analysis.
